Flooding and traffic concerns addressed at land use board meeting. This article was published in the Township Journal on August 4, 2011.
ANDOVER, NJ — Limecrest Quarry Developers had their environmental and traffic experts give testimony to the land use board at a meeting on Aug. 2.
Limecrest is seeking approval for a 100,000-square-foot, 24-hour paving stone plant on Limecrest Rd. in Andover.
Rejina Sharma, of Matrix New World Engineers, said that Limecrest is in the final stages of obtaining approval from the NJ Department of Environmental Protection for two permits. Sharmer said that she expects the permits to be granted by early Nov. of this year.
Sharma drew criticism for not visiting the site during or after a heavy rain to observe flood conditions. However, she said her flood calculations were based on the most conservative criteria available.
According to Sharma, the site as it exists now is “not in good environmental condition” and the proposal would be beneficial to the area.
“Overall, [the proposal] will provide innate improvement to the environmental condition,” said Sharma. “Also, it will uplift the ecological resources.”
The sometimes contentious meeting lasted over three hours and dealt largely with Limecrest’s application.
Limecrest's proposal
Andover Environmental Commission
Land Use Board Chairman John O’Connell asked Bernd Hefele, lawyer for Limecrest Quarry Developers, and Sharma, whether they reviewed the report prepared by the Andover Environmental Commission. Hefele replied that they had and took no issue with any of the commission’s recommendations.
“We will be able to comply and consider all of these items that they are recommending as part of the development of the site,” said Hefele. “There’s nothing in here that we oppose.”
The report calls for the plant to adopt environmentally friendly practices and comply with statewide environmental initiatives. It also encourages limiting light and noise pollution.
“The applicant is going to make this site comply with the noise ordinance in this town,” said Hefele.
Public cross examines environmental expert
The board opened up the public comment period to allow residents to question Limecrest’s environmental expert. First up was Louis Coppolino, who voiced his concerns over the proposed plant at prior land use board meetings. Coppolino lives on nearby Macintosh Dr. and said that years ago, Limecrest backfilled on the same wetlands that are now contained in their proposal. “Why would you want to reward a company for doing illegal stuff to begin with?” said Coppolino. Coppolino called on the board to examine old aerial photographs to substantiate his claim.
John Reed, who lives on Pinkneyville Rd. near the proposed site, raised concerns about flooding in the area being made worse by operations at the plant. According to Sharma the plant’s design will actually help limit the impact of flooding in the area. Sharma also said that there were no endangered species in the proposal area.
Sharma said the environmental impact study she did covers the development of the land and the construction of the building. A board member asked Sharma whether the study examined the impact that a business would have on the environment once the plant was operational. Hefele said the study is specific to a paving stone plant “to some degree.”
No risk of groundwater contamination
Resident Stan Christodlous asked whether operations at the plant would contaminate groundwater.
“In the production process of paving stones…there are no hazardous substances being utilized,” said Hefele. “They are all naturally occuring.”
Concern over end-user
Jeffrey Wolk, whose wife lives in Andover and is a fixture at the Limecrest meetings, questioned why the board was hearing Limecrest’s application if they didn’t have an end-user lined up. Wolk raised this question at the July 19 meeting when it was revealed that Cambridge Pavers Inc. backed out of the plan as co-applicants with Limecrest. Wolk was concerned that a company with a bad environmental track record could come to Andover once the board approved Limecrest’s plan.
Traffic impact
Hefele started this portion of the meeting by saying that the board didn’t really have the authority to deny Limecrest’s application on the basis of any traffic impact that will occur on the plant’s surrounding roads. This is because those roads are owned and maintained by the county and Limecrest has already obtained approval from the Sussex County Land Use Board. Board attorney Richard Brigliadoro confirmed Hefele’s statement.
The expert, Joseph Staigar of Joseph Staigar Engineering, said his firm completed a traffic impact study using Cambridge Pavers as a model for the traffic volume that will occur. Staigar said the plant will run two 12-hour shifts. Twenty-two employees will work at the plant during the day shift and 19 will work the night shift.
Staigar’s report states that delivery of raw materials will occur between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. Monday through Friday and from 7 a.m. to noon on Saturday. “Typically a mix of sand, gravel and cement delivery trucks at a maximum rate of 12 trucks per hour at peak capacity with approximately 10 of those trucks coming from the adjacent quarry.”
Shipping the finished product will require “120 trucks per day with 75 percent of the activity occuring between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. or a maximum of ten trucks per hour.”
Trash pickup will be once a day.
According to the report, incidental deliveries of propane, color additives, spare parts etc… will occur twice daily.
Staigar said that most pickups and deliveries will enter and exit the area via Rt. 15.
“Most of the market would be to the north,” said Staigar.
No right-hand turns
O’Connell asked Hefele if it were possible to have the outgoing trucks turn only left – heading north – onto Limecrest Rd. “I can tell you that we can probably agree to that,” said Hefele. Hefele said that he will confirm the stipulation with his client for the next meeting but doesn’t forsee a problem because most of the trucks would turn left out of the plant anyway on their way to Rt. 15.
Next meeting scheduled for August 16
When residents were allowed to question Staigar, most concerns were about noise pollution and traffic flow. Staigar maintained that roads surrounding the plant would maintain “good levels of service.” As for noise, Limecrest has yet to present their noise study. The next meeting is scheduled for August 16 at 7:30 p.m. at the Municipal Building. Hefele said that meeting would concern some minor engineering items and his noise expert would not be ready to testify until the meeting after. He also said that he expects the remainder of the application process will only require two more meetings.
newshound 
The journalist as diplomat
In September 1973 Australian journalist Wilfred Burchett was approached by an Indian official in Algiers and asked about his relations with the Chinese. India and China were in the midst of a border dispute and Burchett was widely known in Eastern diplomatic circles. He was asked to feel out the Chinese mood for reconciliation and even though the Chinese snubbed the offer, Burchett had this to say in his autobiography:
In disputes between states there are more than reasons of face involved in a leader’s taking the initiative in proposing a solution. There are plenty of examples for the side that takes the initiative to be considered by the other side as weakening and so the pressures should be increased to make him crack. But for either side to reply to a journalist’s well-placed questions involves neither loss of face nor a weakening of a bargaining position. Also, for a journalist to use his unique position to transmit discreetly a bit of information from one side or the other to get clogged machinery moving (without making newspaper headlines out of it) is a useful and honorable thing to do. I have no apologies for having acted as a “drop of oil” on such occasions. (At the barricades, 210)
Wilfred Burchett was said to be the only man who was on intimate terms with both Henry Kissinger and Ho Chi Minh.